The most intriguing definition of political communication
that I happened across in several readings included several comments about a
collaboration between political science and communication/media studies
professionals. The collaboration, said the authors, is a result of these
professionals working together on topics of mutual interest instead of “ignoring
their colleagues” and conducting their own studies. In regards to the transmission
of messages or opinions in “policom,” political communication can be described
as how a candidate communicates, verbally or otherwise, through many channels
and media outlets to get a message to the public and vice versa. Channels and
media outlets for candidates might include their campaign website, social media
pages or campaign ads. The public and press may use those same channels to
interact with or report on candidates as well as take to their own social media
accounts and other public channels to express opinions and communicate with
people of similar, and many times varying, political opinion. The press, like
the public, may interact with candidates or campaign officials via social
media, but the press has a leg up on the public with its ability, in many
cases, to reach the candidate personally as well as has a responsibility to report factual and accurate information
to the public.
A rather colorful example of the practice of policom concepts is Donald Trump’s use of Twitter this campaign season. Trump has, undoubtedly,
been the most outspoken illustrator of many candidate goals, namely, attempting
to make himself more desirable to potential voters by making other candidates
less seem desirable. Trump, while more animated than other candidates, exhibits
policom marketing techniques that most candidates, especially in national
elections, strive for. Trump has derived much of his success in national polls this
season by catering to the other two players’ roles – public and press. When he
makes “shocker statements,” like his idea to deport 11 million people and build
a border wall, the press picks it up, gives Trump free publicity and steals
spotlight potential from others. As far as catering to the public, Trump has
capitalized on the nation’s yearning for firm action by making general,
attractive statements that strike up conversation among voters. It makes sense
as a marketing and campaigning tactic – I mean, who wouldn’t want to “make
America great again”?
No comments:
Post a Comment