The two articles the I gathered are about Donald Trump losing his lead in the republican nomination. One article is from the New York Times and the other is from the Washington Post. Both articles focused on Trump, but were taken in a different approach.
In the Times article it started off in a straight attack to the Republican party by stating that Trump and his allies are trying to undermine the Republican nominating process that is rigged. Further into the article it turn to Trump attacking Cruz stating "Ted Cruz didn't win Iowa , he stole it!" on his Twitter. Later on it begins to talk about the process of delegates in different states and how Cruz could gain more delegates.
In the Washington Post article it starts off with showing Trumps businessman side and how exploited the rules of business, but now he finds himself struggling with GOP nominating rules. The articles goes into Trumps attacks towards the Republican party by saying "These are dirty tricksters. This is a dirty trick." Later on in the article the Post explained the rules of the delegates, but also gave the readers information the Cruz had collected the 34 available delegates.
Even though these two news media outlets wrote an article about the same topic. Each went about it their own way by taking different perspectives on it. In reading the articles it can be seen that both outlets used different attacking methods and also approaches towards the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment