By Branden Camp
I find it interesting that when you step back and analyze an article rather than just read it, you find that many articles are biased and have a strong elements of framing and agenda setting.
The Washington
Post has written several articles focused on the negative attributes of Trumps
personalities. They have headlines like
“To defend our Democracy against Trump….” Early in the article, they point out
that the Republican Party should do everything they can to stop Trump. This is an example of candidate attributes. They point out the flaws in the candidate’s
character in this article. In this same
article they show how Trump is completely at odds with the Republican Party,
which is a conflict frame.
The Washington
Post also published an article that is clearly a horse race frame about Cruz and Trump in a race against each other. The even say in the article that race has
entered a “combative phase” between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.
The article “The
Plausibility of Ted Cruz” by New York Times, Ross Douthat talks
through Cruz’s policy issues on foreign affairs and economic stance. This is a clear issues frame. This article
also focuses on comparing Cruz to Rubio, using words like “attacking” when
discussing how Cruz and Rubio face each other.
So we see some horse race framing
as well as conflict frames. Many of the national news, especially New
York Times and Washington Post, they will focus on one type of frame while at
the same time including some if not all four frames in their articles.
No comments:
Post a Comment